Skip to content
  • Start free trial
An original census record

Start a free trial to view

Get access to the original record, as well as a map showing the local area at the time

Household of Matthew Bailey (born 1862, Congleton)

1911 Census For England & Wales in Stoke upon Trent, Staffordshire

Matthew Bailey and 9 other people are on this record


Get access to the original record, as well as a map showing the local area at the time

Matthew Bailey's household

Male

Matthew

Bailey

Head
Female

Hannah

Bailey

Wife
Female

Jane E

Bailey

Daughter
Female

Rose

Bailey

Daughter
Female

Gertrude

Bailey

Daughter
Male

Matthew

Bailey

Son
Male

Fredrick

Bailey

Son
Male

Thomas

Bailey

Son
Female

Eliza

Bailey

Daughter
Female

Elsie

Bailey

Daughter
First name(s) Matthew
Last name Bailey
Relationship Head
Marital status Married
Age 49
Birth year 1862
Birth place Congleton

Household members (10 people)

First name(s)

Last name

Relationship

Marital status

Age

Birth year

Birth place

Full record

Matthew

Bailey

Head

Married

49

1862

Congleton

Hannah

Bailey

Wife

Married

43

1868

Cabridge

Jane E

Bailey

Daughter

Single

20

1891

Skelmersdale Lanc

Rose

Bailey

Daughter

Single

17

1894

Hanley

Gertrude

Bailey

Daughter

-

13

1898

Hanley

Matthew

Bailey

Son

-

11

1900

Hanley

Fredrick

Bailey

Son

-

9

1902

Hanley

Thomas

Bailey

Son

-

7

1904

Cabridge

Eliza

Bailey

Daughter

-

5

1906

Hanley

Elsie

Bailey

Daughter

-

0

1911

Hanley

Explore Findmypast's newspaper collections

Explore the 1911 Census and millions of historical records for free with Findmypast. Find out more about the household of Matthew Bailey in Stoke upon Trent in 1911, and follow the Bailey family through time in other national records, newspapers and more.

We've found family trees for Matthew Bailey

We’ve found Matthew Bailey in 244 family trees. Find out more about Matthew Bailey's household and view the Bailey family in family trees created by Findmypast members.

Not who you're looking for?